Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
this is the way i founded to submit my patch to aply it:
patch -p0 -i xdot_v5_1_multi_line.patch
inside of the jrfonseca.xdot directory
this issue is not a error or a defect is a patch with a new feature
Original comment by fru...@gmail.com
on 27 Dec 2011 at 4:21
Thanks for your contribution.
Is this supported by the dot language, or a language extension that you wrote?
It seems useful, but if it is a new extension, I'd prefer for it to be done in
coordination with upstream graphviz maintainers, so that it works for all
backends.
Original comment by Jose.R.F...@gmail.com
on 11 Jan 2012 at 1:51
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
EDITED 1 (16/01/2012)
i try to write more easy...
you are welcome, your xdot saved a lot of time in my project.
>Is this supported by the dot language, or a language extension that you wrote?
Is supported by the dot language, i did not modificate any part of dot
language,
only your xdot.py
i put more easy example in
http://code.google.com/p/xdot-multi-line/
example 1
----------
execute:
./example_01.py
you can see a node with 2 lines:
label="{hello\lworld}"
each with his correspondent message when you click the first line
you will obtain the first part of the URL and when you click the second line
you will obtain the second part of the URL:
URL="hello|world",
The parts of the URL are separated by '|' you can change this separator easily
with:
xdot.options.set_multi_line_separator('|')
PD: thanks for your great xdot.py, easy, fast and not java inside :-)
Original comment by fru...@gmail.com
on 16 Jan 2012 at 3:53
Attachments:
Original comment by Jose.R.F...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2013 at 5:49
> > Is this supported by the dot language, or a language extension that you
wrote?
> Is supported by the dot language, i did not modificate any part of dot
language,
only your xdot.py
So, IIUC, if one passes these multiline URLs to dot and generate a SVG, then
one will get invalid URLs.
I really want xdot.py to follow the standard dot language -- I don't want to be
contributing to pollute the graphviz ecosystem with non-standard extensions to
dot language.
As I said, if this is truly useful for everybody, then you should consider
proposing an extension of dot language on graphviz mailing list.
As is now, I'm afraid I can't accept this..
Original comment by Jose.R.F...@gmail.com
on 9 May 2013 at 8:50
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fru...@gmail.com
on 27 Dec 2011 at 4:15Attachments: