.eps figures not appearing

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. upload and include .eps figure file
2.\usepackage{epsfig}
3.
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center} \includegraphics[height=3.5in]{Expected_value} \end{center}
\caption{Approximate expected value of $x_i(t)$}
\end{figure}

4.Complile and export pdf

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected output:  3.5in figure with caption
Instead:  3.5in blank space with appropriate caption.

What version of the product are you using? On what browser?
version 2.0, in Internet Explorer

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by codutime...@gmail.com on 11 May 2010 at 4:01

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I am having the sample problem. Is there no support for including EPS files in 
Latex
Lab thus far?

Original comment by yancswal...@gmail.com on 4 Jun 2010 at 8:55

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Same problem - would be great to be able to view the actual eps figure.

Original comment by schun...@mps.mpg.de on 21 Dec 2010 at 8:28

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Same here... Is it because of the type of compilation done by LaTeX labs ? 
Maybe using pdf will solve the problem ?

Original comment by alain.ba...@gmail.com on 14 Jan 2011 at 9:38

[GoogleCodeExporter]

same issue. how can i upload my entire folder, which has subfolders and figures 
inside them on google latex lab and than how i can give the location of those 
figures ?

Original comment by devvra...@gmail.com on 6 Apr 2011 at 2:32

[GoogleCodeExporter]

scribtex seems to handle all this easily. you can do pdflatex or (ps)latex and 
your eps figures will appear with the latter. All the packages I use for 
linguistics are also installed. Would be nice to see this all implemented here

Original comment by AcmeBalk...@gmail.com on 6 Apr 2011 at 3:00

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Same thing for me. It is useless if you cant include figures. It must be high 
priority to fix this bug.

Original comment by alexei.g...@gmail.com on 15 Nov 2011 at 7:00

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yep, this is a deal-breaker for me. Too bad, looks great otherwise.

Original comment by jeast...@lcogt.net on 7 Mar 2012 at 7:45