google-code-export / leonardosketch

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/leonardosketch
1 stars 0 forks source link

Changes in translation #61

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.open leo and  
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
forgotten or wrong translations

Please use labels and text to provide additional information.
OS:
Linux version 2.6.34.7-0.5-desktop (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 4.5.0 
20100604 [gcc-4_5-branch revision 160292] (SUSE Linux) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT 
2010-10-25 08:40:12 +0200
Java: 
java version "1.6.0_22"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 17.1-b03, mixed mode)
Leo:
Build number: 139 / Build date: 2010-12-18_19-20
Leonardo double-clickable jar version for all platforms

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ABeisemann@gmail.com on 19 Dec 2010 at 8:51

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
some other small changes

Original comment by ABeisemann@gmail.com on 19 Dec 2010 at 11:19

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
No translation changes in version 142

Original comment by ABeisemann@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2010 at 3:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
It looks like you've modified the translation file by hand with some textual 
notes. You could use the new translation GUI editor to create the changes and 
then submit the exported XML file? That will make the diff process smoother and 
more reliable.

I will add the missing keys.

Original comment by joshmari...@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2010 at 5:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I've added the missing keys. You can update the translations now.

Original comment by joshmari...@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2010 at 6:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
prima, and here is the exported file

Original comment by ABeisemann@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2010 at 6:47

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Changed applied. Thanks!

Original comment by joshmari...@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2010 at 7:07