Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
exiftool output in attachments
Original comment by marioosh...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2011 at 10:48
Attachments:
Thank you for this report. I'm not in front of the code right now but my guess
is that the ISO tag wasn't moved correctly when the ExifDirectory was split in
two. I will re-read the exif spec to ensure that the split is valid and the
implementation correct.
Original comment by drewnoakes
on 27 Jul 2011 at 6:12
From looking at line 51 of the exiftool output, you can see that the ISO value
is actually blank for that imate. It seems that the D90 doesn't use the
standard ISO tag, instead using a set of Nikon-specific tags.
It would seem that exiftool has better support for this camera makernote than
metadata-extractor currently does.
I'm going to update this issue's summary to capture the need to improve
makernote support for the D90. Luckily I have one to experiment with.
I can see how it would be valuable to have the standard ISO tag return the
value from the Nikon makernote, but this is not currently something that would
be straightforward to achieve. It's an interesting idea, to try and capture a
certain type of tag value from across a range of directories. Unfortunately I
can't see a straightforward way to add this right now.
I'll update this issue if I learn more about the D90's implementation.
Original comment by drewnoakes
on 18 Nov 2011 at 10:01
Original comment by drewnoakes
on 20 May 2012 at 5:56
Relates to http://code.google.com/p/metadata-extractor/issues/detail?id=26
Original comment by drewnoakes
on 16 Oct 2012 at 5:44
Original comment by drewnoakes
on 16 Oct 2012 at 5:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
marioosh...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2011 at 10:20Attachments: