Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by jajwil...@gmail.com
on 8 Mar 2013 at 10:58
Original comment by jajwil...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2013 at 2:14
How would you like this to work? I could make each field resizable individually
but it would still be a pain to have to go through each field to resize them,
and be pointless if the field were an int or only contained a small number of
chars... please advise
Original comment by thest...@gmail.com
on 6 Aug 2013 at 2:29
I'm imagining that each field would be the width of the longest string of data
within it, up to a certain maximum (e.g. 40 characters). I think that this
would make better use of screen 'real estate', especially given that the
average column of ints doesn't need to be very wide. It's something we'd need
to evaluate with users, however. It shouldn't be a high priority.
Original comment by jajwil...@gmail.com
on 6 Aug 2013 at 3:53
Original comment by jajwil...@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2013 at 10:06
One for Joe?
Original comment by thest...@gmail.com
on 11 Oct 2013 at 10:14
Possibly - although I'm guessing that because the width of each column will be
depended on the nature of the data in that column its display will need to be
quite tightly integrated with the source code in this instance. Maybe assign it
to Joe and see if he has any ideas?
Original comment by jajwil...@gmail.com
on 11 Oct 2013 at 1:06
I've had a look into this and I can't really see any solution. There's no way
to know which columns are going to contain lots of data and which aren't.
There may be some Javascript widget to allow users to drag column widths, but
I"m not sure this is a priority...
Original comment by jos...@josephbloggs.com
on 11 Oct 2013 at 3:36
I've had a think about this and a chat with James. I think the way forward is
to have ORDS "understand" the fields it is presenting and provide a suggested
field width for each column in a page of data. That width can then be used in
table.jsp to give the sizes.
Original comment by thest...@gmail.com
on 11 Nov 2013 at 2:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jajwil...@gmail.com
on 23 Oct 2012 at 3:37