Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
sorry cannot attach the file as it is too big (12M)
Note:
* the this is not a matter of codecs as I already installed the latest codec.
* tried with XP and Ubuntu: same issue
Original comment by jphi.tr...@gmail.com
on 25 Apr 2012 at 6:43
Some discussion thread about the issue there:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-1133060.html
One picture with the issue here:
http://macandphoto.typepad.com/files/img_0125.cr2
Original comment by jphi.tr...@gmail.com
on 25 Apr 2012 at 6:51
Thanks for reporting. Confirmed with the cr2 you linked to.
However the culprit is not Photivo but dcraw. Photivo has dcraw 1.445 built-in
to decode raw files. Standalone dcraw 1.445 exhibits the same problem. The good
news: The most recent standalone dcraw 1.447 works fine. So the problem will be
gone once we update dcraw in Photivo. I can’t say exactly when this will
happen, though.
Original comment by brother.john.gm@googlemail.com
on 25 Apr 2012 at 8:41
I've had this issue also on Raw files. Shot in Aperture priority, no special
settings.
Original comment by larson.p...@gmail.com
on 9 May 2012 at 2:41
On Ubuntu 12.04 (with some enhancements from following 12.10) I compiled
Photivo from most recent source (also GraphicsMagick 16-bit depth). Aware of
the dcraw issue, I obtain version 1.447 dcraw.c and also disabled wget in its
update script, in the photivo/ReferenceMaterial/dcraw source folder.
Photivo compiles easily (thanks to clear insructions on the wiki). However,
even with dcraw 1.447, I still get the magenta -grey problem for *.CR2 files
from my Canon S100. I note that I can first convert to *.dng and then there's
no problem.
When I open a *.CR2 in Photivo, with the incorrect colors, Changing a color
profile (using a local *.icc file of any kind) does not help.
This isn't paticular to ubuntu (Linux). I also have the pe-compiled Windows
verion of Photivo, and seen the same problem, as was previously reported.
I notice that the problem is NOT a matter of white balance or color
temperature. When I look at the values for each color channel, I not that for a
grey-ish subject, the red and blue channels have intensities clustered where
expected, but the green channel has intensities clusered at the other end.
To clarify what I mean: If the subject's blue channel has peak intensity
clustered near value 200 (out of 255) when brought into Photivo, and the red
channel clustered near 180, then the green channel will be clustered near 60
rather than the expected 195. In the green channel, bright is dark and dark is
bright.
I have attempted to randomly change some numbers within dcraw.c, but I cannot
actually program, and I don't know what the numbers mean. So far, no luck.
Aside: For those who ask about distortion (curvature of image), what you are
seeing is the actual unprocessed image as it comes from the camera. The lens
itself causes the distortion, which is most noticeable at wide angles. The
camera's JPEG output was pre-processed by the camera, to remove the distortion.
If you use Canon's own DPP program, it also pre-removes the distortion. In
other words, Photivo is not causing distortion; it is merely not removing the
original distortion.
Original comment by hahbumb3...@gmail.com
on 3 Jun 2012 at 6:05
Actually the dcraw.c file in ReferenceMaterial is not part of the Photivo
source code. It’s just there for reference. Updating that file won’t change
anything in Photivo itself. The “productive” dcraw is in Sources/ptDcraw
but updating that one is not exactly trivial.
Original comment by brother.john.gm@googlemail.com
on 3 Jun 2012 at 7:33
Ah. Well, I cannot write code (just cut and paste), so if the file change is
not exactly trivial, I'll have to wait. Meanwhile, I can communicate with
Photivo via DNG.
Original comment by hahbumb3...@gmail.com
on 4 Jun 2012 at 9:53
Works with current source. Please get an update biary or build from current
source.
greets mike
Original comment by m...@mm-log.com
on 29 Sep 2012 at 11:48
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jphi.tr...@gmail.com
on 25 Apr 2012 at 6:39