google-code-export / red5

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/red5
0 stars 0 forks source link

Maven repository is broken #442

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Check this blog entry 
http://blog.infrared5.com/2013/01/red5-1-0-1-released/comment-page-1/ and add 
the repository to your pom
2. add the server dependency for java6 stable release:
<dependency>
    <groupId>org.red5</groupId>
    <artifactId>red5-server</artifactId>
    <version>1.0.1-java6</version>
</dependency>
3.Compilation will fail. inspecting the repository i noticed that the jar is 
named red5-server-1.0.1-java.jar instead of red5-server-1.0.1-java6.jar (a '6' 
is missing)

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Compilation should succeed. Instead it fails

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
1.0.1-java6 on Ubuntu 13.10

Please provide any additional information below.

Please add the sources in the repository as well.
It will improve usability of the APIs in eclipse (maven will download and 
attach the sources automagically).

Thanks
Giordano

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jorda...@gmail.com on 25 Sep 2013 at 9:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I also add the fact that if I switch to tje java 7 implementation, some of the 
dependencies specified in the pom are missing, thus compilation still fails.
Apparently the problematic packages are the apache mina-* of type "bundle"

The following artifacts could not be resolved: 
org.apache.mina:mina-core:bundle:2.0.7, 
org.apache.mina:mina-integration-jmx:bundle:2.0.7, 
org.apache.mina:mina-integration-beans:bundle:2.0.7: Failure to find 
org.apache.mina:mina-core:bundle:2.0.7 in 
http://red5.googlecode.com/svn/repository was cached in the local repository, 
resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of Red5 has 
elapsed or updates are forced -> [Help 1]

Original comment by jorda...@gmail.com on 25 Sep 2013 at 10:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I'll look into it, but for the "bundle" stuff you need the "felix" entry; 
remember that's their doing, not ours.

Original comment by mondain on 27 Sep 2013 at 6:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This issue was closed by revision r4731.

Original comment by mondain on 31 Oct 2013 at 11:11