What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. create a class Node:
class Node < ActiveLdap::Base
ldap_mapping
end
2. Node.find(:first, :filter => 'cn=test')
This works for me for a long time (rails 2.3.5, rub-ldap-0.9.9,
activeldap-1.2.1). After an active directory schema upgrade for exchange 2010
all my programs failed.
I get an unknown error. Playing around with tcpdump i found the following
schema request:
-b "CN=Aggregate,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=<my-domain>,DC=<top>" \
objectClass=subschema objectClasses attributeTypes matchingRules \
matchingRuleUse dITStructureRules dITContentRules nameForms ldapSyntaxes
Using ldapsearch i can separate perform two separate attribute searches
for
1: objectClasses attributeTypes matchingRules \
matchingRuleUse dITStructureRules nameForms ldapSyntaxes
2: dITContentRules
but not both in one request, as lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb in method
schema, line 116 and below.
With the following hack i could get the schema request working:
1. rails 2.3.8
2. activeldap > 1.2.2 from svn
3. splitting the schema request in lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb in to ldap
searches and merging the attribute hashes before create a new schema (see
attachment)
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
rails 2.3.5/2.3.8, activeldap-1.2.2/svn, ubuntu 10.10, debian lenny.
LDAP: Active Directory 2003 with schema preparations for 2008, Exchange 2007,
Exchange 2010.
Please provide any additional information below.
I tried the hack with activeldap-1.2.1 and activeldap-1.2.2 without success
(unknown attribute dn due to a case mismatch).
I also tried to increment the server limits with ntdsutil -> ldap policies, but
without success.
The problem can be reproduced with
ldapsearch -h <host> -p 3268 -D <bindDN> -W -z 0 -LLL -s base -b \
"CN=Aggregate,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=<my-domain>,DC=<tld>" \
objectClass=subschema objectClasses attributeTypes matchingRules \
matchingRuleUse dITStructureRules dITContentRules nameForms ldapSyntaxes
The problem depends on the real schema size. In our Active Directory the
resulting schema size is about 1.5 MByte.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by swobsp...@gmail.com on 21 Nov 2010 at 11:13
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
swobsp...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2010 at 11:13Attachments: