Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
When I ran the above I noticed:
>>storage101.ord1.clouddrive.com
I was creating the bucket in DFW. Tried creating the bucket in ORD and it
worked.
The VM is in DFW so having a bucket created in a different data center may be
slower and likely pay bandwith on both ends (the VM and the Cloud files).
Original comment by franci...@natserv.net
on 6 May 2013 at 4:14
That's a problem on Rackspace's end then. The storage101.ord1.clouddrive.com
comes from Rackspace's auth server. Can you get in touch with them?
Original comment by Nikolaus@rath.org
on 6 May 2013 at 4:32
Done. Will let you know what they answer.
Original comment by franci...@natserv.net
on 6 May 2013 at 4:34
Got a reply from Rackspace.
-------------
Looking at your account, it looks like ORD is your accounts default data
center, so if the s3ql author is using the old v1 of our api, then it will
only show one data center with those calls. We can switch that to make DFW your
default provisioning point if you like, but we do see alot of programs not
using the newer api version, or not designed to offer an option to select the
data center.
Original comment by franci...@natserv.net
on 6 May 2013 at 4:47
Original comment by Nikolaus@rath.org
on 6 May 2013 at 5:26
I was looking into this, but the RackSpace API documentation at
http://docs.rackspace.com/files/api/v1/cf-devguide/content/Authentication-d1e639
.html doesn't say anything about a newer API. Do you have link with
documentation for the newer API?
Original comment by Nikolaus@rath.org
on 2 Jun 2013 at 3:40
How about this:
http://docs.rackspace.com/auth/api/v2.0/auth-client-devguide/content/Sample_Requ
est_Response-d1e64.html
Entry point for v2.0 api
http://docs.rackspace.com/auth/api/v2.0/auth-client-devguide/content/Overview-d1
e65.html
Original comment by franci...@natserv.net
on 2 Jun 2013 at 3:46
Issue 380 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by Nikolaus@rath.org
on 2 Jun 2013 at 4:29
I see, thanks! It's weird that the CloudFiles documentation doesn't even
mention that a different kind of authentication is possible.
Doing keystone auth itself seems rather easy. However, I'm not yet sure how
this is going to help with automatic datacenter selection. With keystone auth,
S3QL has the proper server name for every datacenter, but I do not yet see a
way to determine which datacenter to use for a given container. Having to
specify that manually would be rather annoying...
Original comment by Nikolaus@rath.org
on 2 Jun 2013 at 4:33
This issue was closed by revision 19e730e10cf1.
Original comment by Nikolaus@rath.org
on 7 Jul 2013 at 4:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
franci...@natserv.net
on 6 May 2013 at 4:07