Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by v...@aarontitus.net
on 1 Jan 2013 at 7:32
How should this logic be changed to handle the statuses of multiple phases?
(issue 134 and issue 139)
Show maximal/'worst' colour/icon?
Original comment by cpw...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2013 at 6:00
Or go down the road of combining or stacking icons? Probably too complex.
Original comment by cpw...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2013 at 6:01
Currently, there is only one map, and everyone sees exactly the same thing. In
a future version, each organization will have an organization-centric view of
the map. For example, Org A signs up for an incident and says, "We do
Assessment and Muckouts, but nothing else." Org B says, "We do rebuilding and
refurbishing, and nothing else."
Hypothetical Work Order A123 needs to be mucked out. Org A does the assessment
and it gets put on the map. Org A logs in, and it appears Red, because it is
ready to be claimed and mucked out. However, when Org B logs in, it either
doesn't appear, or appears Gray. Org A assigns the work order, completes it,
and marks it complete. To Org A, the work order appears green. But now that
it is ready for the next phase, it appears as Red on Org B's screen, because it
is unclaimed for the next phase, and ready to be rebuilt.
So the answer to the question is: Organization-specific views of the map. Does
that help?
This means we may need to change the logic above:
* If Unclaimed and "Open, not ready": Red (for now).
See Issue 21 #14
Original comment by v...@aarontitus.net
on 5 Feb 2013 at 7:08
Understood - but what happens when an organisation has multiple specialities,
e.g. Org C does assessments, muckouts, rebuilding and refurbishing etc.?
What does Org C see in your example? If only a single icon is shown, I would
assume it would be the icon of the maximal status of all relevant phases (eg.
if phase 1 is red and phase 2 is green and both are relevant to Org C, show red
to Org C).
In the short term, this logic could also be used for the single, one-view map.
Original comment by cpw...@gmail.com
on 6 Feb 2013 at 11:23
I am creating a .pptx illustrating how this is to work in practice. It still
needs some work, but once it's ready, I'll post it here.
Original comment by v...@aarontitus.net
on 7 Feb 2013 at 2:33
Here is the PowerPoint. I distributed this via email earlier. It isn't perfect,
but provides a starting point.
Original comment by v...@aarontitus.net
on 27 Feb 2013 at 4:08
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
v...@aarontitus.net
on 11 Dec 2012 at 6:24