This is easily misinterpreted as printing the number of data points read, and
it is not clear that this is only those within tracks specified as segmentation
tracks in the segmentation track line.
This should probably be changed to:
1) print the total number of data points read first.
2) if the number of data points read from segmentation tracks is printed at
all, if it is zero, "Segmentation tracks unspecified" or something like that
should be printed instead of just the "0".
Original issue reported on code.google.com by orion.bu...@gmail.com on 3 Sep 2010 at 5:32
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
orion.bu...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2010 at 5:32