Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Just added tests/non-licensed/perf/test6, which tests long path statements,
lots of
path statements, and the exact data inside svgweb-test.svg as stand alone
ActionScript classes. None of them replicate the slowness, so I'll have to try
another tack.
Original comment by bradneub...@google.com
on 12 Feb 2010 at 8:01
So I found the culprite; it's no longer string parsing at all. In
tests/non-licensed/test7 I've tracked it down to the draw() method, specifically
whenever we make curves with drawSprite.graphics.curveTo(). It looks like the
Flash
curveTo method is _very_ slow.
Original comment by bradneub...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2010 at 10:28
Jeff Schiller also pointed me to the Flash 10 drawPath method on the Graphics
object,
which claims that its faster for curves:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/AS3LCR/Flash_10.0/flash/display/Graphics.html#drawPa
th%28%29
I'll do some benchmarking
Original comment by bradneub...@gmail.com
on 13 Feb 2010 at 12:01
I found the bottleneck! It turns out that drawSprite.graphics.curveTo is _very_
slow
when the miter join style is turned on, in nodeBeginStroke in SVGNode:
// jointStyle="miter" is VERY VERY slow!!!
drawSprite.graphics.lineStyle(line_width, line_color, line_alpha, false,
LineScaleMode.NORMAL, capsStyle); /*, jointStyle,
SVGColors.cleanNumber(miterLimit));*/
If I comment things out as you see above the speed goes from 10 minutes to ~2.5
seconds!
Still investigating how this impacts things and how this might diverge from SVG
spec.
Other samples are _much_ faster, like the photorealistic car drawings that used
to be
slow.
Original comment by bradneub...@gmail.com
on 19 Feb 2010 at 6:42
This is a duplicate of Issue 437.
Miter is the default which is a bummer.
Your results are perplexing because I ran a bunch of tests and did not find that
changing the join style made much difference. Perhaps I did not run the tests
correctly. Sigh.
What platform did you test on?
Original comment by grick23@gmail.com
on 20 Feb 2010 at 4:12
Mac OS X 10.5.8 with Flash 10. I ran the sample in
tests/non-licensed/vector-text1/svg-test.html which has a huge number of
curves. I'm
thinking the right way to go is to support the shape-rendering property, expose
it so
that the Flash side of things can see what the value is, and make the default
for SVG
Web be 'optimizeSpeed'. The effect on performance is huge. Page authors can
optionally specify shape-rendering to be 'geometricPrecision' which would then
default to the Miter limit. If we default 'shape-rendering' to 'optimizeSpeed',
we
should just make the Miter be Flash's default in nodeBeginStroke if no Miter is
specified. This would then make the common case very fast for people.
Original comment by bradneub...@gmail.com
on 20 Feb 2010 at 7:01
Shape-rendering property is specified here in the spec:
http://zvon.org/xxl/svgReference/Standard1.1/painting.html#ShapeRenderingPropert
y
The spec actually defaults it to auto, which says:
"Indicates that the user agent shall make appropriate tradeoffs to balance
speed,
crisp edges and geometric precision, but with geometric precision given more
importance than speed and crisp edges."
I think its probably appropriate to keep it as auto but in the spirit of what
it says
about balancing performance in nodeBeginStroke we can default to Flash's joint
style
instead of Miter if it is not specified.
Original comment by bradneub...@gmail.com
on 20 Feb 2010 at 7:04
In reply to comment 7:
As a general comment, I'd suggest using the current editor's draft [1] for
Second
Edition of the SVG 1.1 specification:
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/
There are lots of clarifications and it's probably (very) close to the final
document. ;-)
As a side note, the part which was referenced is exactly the same [2]:
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/painting.html#ShapeRenderingPropert
y
Original comment by helder.magalhaes
on 20 Feb 2010 at 1:08
Fixed with Issue 437 and Issue 438.
Original comment by bradneub...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2010 at 12:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bradneub...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2010 at 12:24