Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
It occurred to me this morning that this class is not an _ImplBase and so the
name should change. Not sure what to call it - maybe UimaFitTest.
Original comment by pvogren@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2010 at 1:30
I usually call abstract base classes for test cases XXXTestBase. If you have
the some XXX in front and Base in the end, Maven should also not think it would
be a real test case and try to execute it.
It is possible to fine-tune what Maven recognizes as tests via the Surefire
Maven Plugin.
So I would suggest UimaFitTestBase - or something more specific if there be,
e.g. ComponentTestBase. I would prefer the latter.
Original comment by richard.eckart
on 11 Jun 2010 at 1:34
I like UimaFitTestBase. What does "Component" mean in the other name?
Original comment by pvogren@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2010 at 2:58
Original comment by pvogren@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2010 at 6:06
Well, when it provides a CAS and a type system, it seems quite likely that it
will be used for testing some UIMA component, e.g. a reader or analysis engine.
Original comment by richard.eckart
on 11 Jun 2010 at 8:27
Works for me. I will rename ComponentTestBase.
Original comment by pvogren@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2010 at 8:35
I renamed Test_ImplBase to ComponentTestBase and committed.
Original comment by pvogren@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2010 at 8:46
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pvogren@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2010 at 4:04