State machine repeated definition doesn't work

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Load the code below. There are a number of oddities that need resolving.

The second and subsequent occurrences of declaration of sm should be just aded 
together. Currently they are ignored whether in the same class definition, or a 
mixing class definition

class X {
  sm {
    s1 {
      e->s2;
      e4 -> s4;
    }
    s1 {
      e1 -> s2;
    }
    s2 {
      s3 {e6 -> s1;}
      s3 {}
      s1 {e7 -> s2;}
    }
  }
  sm {
    s8 {
       e9 -> s9;
    }
    s9 {}
  }
}

class X {
  a;
  sm {
    s4 {}
    s5 {}
  }
}

Original issue reported on code.google.com by TimothyCLethbridge on 24 Jan 2014 at 10:11

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by TimothyCLethbridge on 24 Jan 2014 at 10:12

• Changed title: State machine repeated definition doesn't work
• Added labels: ucosp, Component-SemanticsAndGen, Diffic-Easy, stateMachines

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Probably this issue was solved with the patches that solved issues 200/199 and 
580.

Original comment by PedroAug...@gmail.com on 4 Jun 2014 at 3:19

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This example code doesn't generate a diagram

Original comment by TimothyCLethbridge on 27 Jun 2014 at 6:30