Ruby abstract methods are not "ruby-like"

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
Use input: 
generate Ruby;
namespace example;

class AssociationRule
{
  abstract;

  public abstract Double getPrimaryMetricValue();
  public abstract Integer getNoValue();
}

class Rule {
  abstract;
  isA AssociationRule;

  public abstract Double getPrimaryMetricValue();

  public Integer getNoValue() {
    0
  }
}

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

The result creates "no-op" methods instead of asserting at runtime that the 
methods must be implemented.

Please use labels and text to provide additional information.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by kevin.br...@gmail.com on 17 Jan 2015 at 9:14

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Patch submitted to @aforward and Tim. 

Original comment by kevin.br...@gmail.com on 17 Jan 2015 at 10:52

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by kevin.br...@gmail.com on 11 Feb 2015 at 9:41

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by kevin.br...@gmail.com on 3 Mar 2015 at 1:10

• Changed state: Fixed