Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Hi Brian,
I've got fourcomments about your code:
1) The license: we are on the MIT license. I don't know if we can mix this
license with the Apache2 license
2) HoverIntentJavaScriptResourceReference should inherit the
WiQueryJavascriptResourceReference
3) What about the public AccordionTriggerEvent getEvent() ? (I can see a
problem of conversion)
4) Hoverintent is not a based option of the Accordion. And maybe the jQuery UI
team will provide for the next release (with a different name). So, maybe we
can provide an interface for the AccordionTriggerEvent enumeration and create
another enumeration with this interface and with your HOVERINTENT (I don't
know, because the getEvent return the AccordionTriggerEvent enumeration. So, we
can loose backward)
If we can resolve the three first points, I think we can use your patch.
Thank you for your contribution !!
Regards
Julien Roche
Original comment by roche....@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2010 at 8:00
@Brian
I thought you mean create a new patch for wiquery-plugins project not wiquery
itself:-)
For me this makes sense if you want to have some kind of extension of accordion
but not sure we should add that wiquery core.
Regards,
Ernesto
Original comment by reier...@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2010 at 8:12
Yep,
You can find some based of plugins on this link:
http://code.google.com/p/wiquery-plugins/
Cheers
Julien Roche
Original comment by roche....@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2010 at 8:59
Hi guys, thanks for your consideration. I am a beginner with jQuery/wiQuery
and just had something that worked well for me and wanted to share it. As you
can see, I just grabbed the existing Hover* class that Ernesto had done in
plugins (which was ASF licensed) and put it together with a different js, then
patched the accordion to work with different options. I put a comment in the
code that I didn't know what the best way to go about this was. My
contribution here should be considered an unrestricted grant that can be
relicensed at will. I claim no ownership of it.
The reason I did it in the main project was because there can't be a dependency
from the main project to the plugins project. I see what you mean about the
jQuery team not having a hover option, this is where my inexperience with their
patterns is a problem. It did seem that hover intent is a mixin, I just didn't
know how to best express that in the code. Maybe it shouldn't touch Accordion
at all.
I really appreciate the attention, but I have this working in my own code
without the patch by subclassing Accordion and setting the options manually. I
was just trying to share with the community and help move things forward a
little bit. Accordion mouseovers are a *lot* nicer with hover intent.
Cheers guys!
Brian
Original comment by brian.topping
on 30 Nov 2010 at 4:40
I close for the moment this issue. Maybe you can provide an issue into the
wiquery-plugins google project to add a plugin for the hoverintent ?
Cheers
Julien Roche
Original comment by roche....@gmail.com
on 7 Dec 2010 at 7:49
No worries, I just use an inner subclass in my Page class:
private static class HoverIntentAccordion extends Accordion {
public HoverIntentAccordion() {
super("accordion");
getOptions().putLiteral("event", "click hoverintent");
}
@Override
public void contribute(WiQueryResourceManager wiQueryResourceManager) {
super.contribute(wiQueryResourceManager);
wiQueryResourceManager.addJavaScriptResource(HoverIntentJavaScriptResourceReference.get());
}
}
It didn't make a lot of sense to me how else this could be implemented outside
of wiquery-core, nor does it seem to make sense as a plugin. It's a small
amount of code to add to get the additional functionality, but I'm set so no
big deal on my end.
Cheers, Brian
Original comment by brian.topping
on 7 Dec 2010 at 8:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
brian.topping
on 30 Nov 2010 at 7:41Attachments: