Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Can you perhaps provide us with a quickstart or example project to test this?
I'd like to test any fixes with the same sources as the reporter.
Original comment by hielke.hoeve
on 27 Jan 2011 at 12:45
[deleted comment]
I have created a litte example project from your quickstart.
"HomePage" creates 25 containers, a draggable and a droppable. After dragging
the draggable onto the droppable, a notification message appears.
This takes ~30 seconds for me.
Original comment by simon.br...@googlemail.com
on 27 Jan 2011 at 6:24
Attachments:
Oh yes, an obvious bug. This was probably added a long time ago to fix
something in Wicket.
I have removed the extra call and the ajax call is near instant in FireFox
3.6.13.
It's committed for WiQuery 1.1 trunk and WiQuery 1.2 trunk, if you are using
sources then please update. Otherwise a SNAPSHOT release will come tomorrow.
Original comment by hielke.hoeve
on 27 Jan 2011 at 8:12
Hi,
I have a similar problem using SortableAjaxBehavior.
The call from line 396 in SortableAjaxBehavior:
/* line :395*/MarkupIdVisitor visitor = new MarkupIdVisitor(input);
/* line :396*/this.getComponent().getPage().visitChildren(visitor);
takes a lot of time when I have a page with a deep hierarchy of containers.
Inspecting the MarkupIdVisitor class, it seems like the extra call is still
there:
if (component instanceof MarkupContainer)
{
((MarkupContainer) component).visitChildren(Component.class, this);
}
The version of wiquery-core I'm using in my project is : wiquery-core-1.5.6.
In which version is this fixed? It seems that the trunk does still contain this
line and the newest version of this file is from 22 September 2011.
Thanks,
Cristi
Original comment by cristi.c...@gmail.com
on 10 Aug 2012 at 12:07
I have checked it again with wiquery-jquery-ui version 1.5.7 and wicket 1.5.7
and it is not fixed. Running the attached application took on my machine almost
8 seconds for the ajax call to complete. Can you please tell me on which
version is it fixed? (The trunk contains the same version shown in my previous
comment).
Original comment by cristi.c...@gmail.com
on 9 Nov 2012 at 3:40
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
simon.br...@googlemail.com
on 26 Jan 2011 at 11:08