What steps will reproduce the problem?
Used Wndchrm 1.30-140 on a Wndchrm 1.28 .fit file. Used switches to mimik 1.28
functionality.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Wndchrm 1.28 on wndchrm1.28.fit = Accuracy 70%
Wndchrm 1.30 on wndchrm1.28.fit = Accuracy 63%
Wndchrm 1.30 on wndchrm1.30.fit = Accuracy 45%
(generating new .sig files from the same images)
*Interesting.. my number of Images used for testing and training in
Wndchrm1.30-140 is 10 times greater. Possibly due to 10 splits?
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Wndchrm1.30 Checkout 140
Mac OS 10.6.6
Please provide any additional information below.
zipped .fit and .html attached.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by DuncanDe...@gmail.com on 14 Mar 2011 at 6:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
DuncanDe...@gmail.com
on 14 Mar 2011 at 6:58Attachments: