Closed michael753-yen closed 5 months ago
The program uses directional angles you can look that up on wikipedia
It has nothing to do with directional angle.
(here directional angle means 360°-∠AHE
)
∠BHE = ∠AFE
is right, but how can ∠AHE
represents ∠BHE
?
As Noxlgoldi said, this is correct, you can assume this one and follow all the logic, you will see it is correct.
@szhang99 yeah, your're right.
003. A,D,F are collinear [06] & B,A,H are collinear [09] & ∠AHE = ∠AFE [12] ⇒ ∠DFE = ∠AHE [13]
It got back on track immediately at the next step.
So, maybe I'll just ignore it?
This is the correct syntax, treat two angles \alpha=\beta if and only if sin(\alpha)=sin(\beta), things always work(see Johnson's book Advanced Euclidean Geometry)
@szhang99 thanks a lot! The book you mentioned is very helpful. Btw, I'm a Taiwanese student but I have never heard of "directed angle". Is it a common sense to you guys?
Here is the problem in nature language: There is a square ABCD with E as the intersection of its diagonals. F is a point on AD. Let G be a circle that passes through A, P, and F, intersects AC at Point H. translated into geometric language
a b c d = isquare a b c d; p = on_line p a c, on_line p b d; e = on_line e a d; o = circle o a e p; f = on_circle f o a, on_line f a b ? cong d e a f
alphageometry's proof is as following:Obviously, the 002 step is already wrong, it should be like
∠AHE+∠AFE=180°
rather than∠AHE = ∠AFE
‧I've tried to modify the rules.txt, but it doesn't work at all. Is there any way to fix it?