Closed lxuechen closed 3 years ago
It would be nice to add a test that verifies that logqp is computing the thing it claims to be. Other than that, this looks pretty good.
This would be a little difficult to check. Given that the augmentation is quite simple, I think that the chances of there being a bug is quite low.
I'll run the example with this logqp argument to check if the model still trains, but I don't think it's natural to include this in a test suite.
logqp backwards compatibility.