Open cug-xyx opened 8 months ago
What specifically do you mean by "shaded"?
I'm sorry. Maybe I didn't describe it properly.
This image is ok on GEE
.
var dataset = ee.ImageCollection('MODIS/NTSG/MOD16A2/105');
var ET = dataset.select('ET').filterDate('2013-06-02', '2013-06-03');
var ETVis = {
min: 0,
max: 300,
palette:
['#ffffff', '#fcd163', '#99b718', '#66a000',
'#3e8601', '#207401', '#056201', '#004c00', '#011301'],
};
Map.addLayer(ET, ETVis, 'Evapotranspiration');
But exporting locally using xee
results in something like the following:
Ah, you mean the weird yellow area over Americas and Antarctica. I agree this is wrong.
Indeed. But xee
is so good that I just can't live without it, so I'm looking for a solution here
Let's see what the actual developers say - I'm just another xee user
Have you tried this with different times or different bands and does it yield the same result? I am also having a problem with bringing MODIS data across via xee, though a bit different to what you are showing.
Have you tried this with different times or different bands and does it yield the same result? I am also having a problem with bringing MODIS data across via xee, though a bit different to what you are showing.
@scheip, I've tried different periods and it's the same problem :(
What I notice about this dataset is that each band has a different scale, which is the same case as #122. There is a chunk of code in get_info
where xee infers a number of collection-wide attributes like the primary coordinate. Just spitballing, but maybe that has something to do with it? Like that data differs between bands with different scales?
Dear Developers:
Thank you so much for being able to develop the awesome
xee
.I was downloading the MODIS series product (MODIS/061/MOD16A2GF) and noticed that the downloaded data was shaded.
I think it's a problem with the
crs
.Here are the images and code: