Open niloc132 opened 4 months ago
@mollyibot Could you patch the PR internally and see if it causes any problems?
@jDramaix Could you first provide general feedback on the direction before asking Colin to invest more time adapting the solution?
I apologize for the churn, and am happy to spend some time exploring to make this work.
The issue I'm seeking to resolve is that when jsinterop-generator builds elemental2, it sees these types and emits classes for them rather than interfaces, and so when a typedarray of some kind is used generically, the compiler emits casts, and those will fail since there is no constructor called TypedArray or ArrayBufferView in the global context.
Note that there is a constructor called TypedArray
, so it is not fully accurate to call this an interface:
> (new Uint8Array()).__proto__.__proto__.constructor
< function TypedArray()
However, this is not accessible on the "global this", so cannot be used when performing instanceof
checks. In theory GWT/J2CL could make the call above to find it, but that seems like more trouble than it would be worth?
Please let me know if there's another straightforward direction I can pursue here. I did not start trying to build elemental2 yet from this change, imagining incorrectly that it would just change the inheritance structure to the desired format. I can take a closer in a week or two, and hold off on this change for now, or if you see a fruitful direction for me to try I would be happy to follow that?
--
At a glance, I'm not clear how to override the closure-compiler repo used by elemental2 - I followed the steps provided, but my changes to closure-compiler don't seem to be reflected in the generated output (both in that I still see public class Float64Array extends TypedArray
, and I don't see the failures @mollyibot mentioned above). Given that closure-compiler is now a bazel project, it looks like I want something more like
local_repository(
name = "com_google_javascript_closure_compiler",
path = "/home/colin/workspace/closure-compiler",
# build_file = "jscomp.BUILD",
)
but that doesn't quite get it right - it looks like transitive dependencies from closure aren't picked up this way (@google_bazel_common
, @com_github_johnynek_bazel_jar_jar
, etc), and inlining most of closure's WORKSPACE then results in other issues...
I agree that defining TypedArray
and ArrayBufferView
as interfaces is the correct approach. This aligns with how they're defined in JavaScript.
To have this change compiling successfully, we need to modify several things:
Int8Array
, Uint8Array
, etc.) explicitly redefine the methods from TypedArray
and ArrayBufferView
in the extern files.TypedArray
and ArrayBufferView
in integer_entity.txt will need to be duplicated for each child type. (This could be simplified on the JsInterop-generator side @mollyibot)TypedArray
redefines the length property of the IArrayLike
parent interface. It was not an issue before when TypedArray
was a class. But now it's an interface, JsInterop generator, will generates a JsProperty method that will conflict with the JsOverlay method present on JsArrayLike
interface (type defined in jsinterop-base to represent IArrayLike
)Note that this change is likely to be a breaking change internally, so it may require some time before merging it.
At a glance, I'm not clear how to override the closure-compiler repo used by elemental2 -
We used the extern files coming the closure compiler jar embedded in rules_closure We expect to have a @com_google_javascript_closure_compiler//:externs
target representing a zip file containing all the extern files.
You should be able to override that at the end of the WORKSPACE file
Technically, the former appears to be a typedef and the latter might be a template for classes? But neither exists as a named function/constructor. Earlier versions of the spec do indicate that both were at one point interfaces though.
This impacts https://github.com/google/elemental2, which then tries to use both types on the right side of JS
instanceof
operations, which will fail ("Right-hand side of 'instanceof' is not an object").As an alternative, one or both could be a typedef as the second link below seems to say? The archive.org link shows the older version where both were defined as interfaces.
https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/ordinary-and-exotic-objects-behaviours.html#typedarray https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#ArrayBufferView http://web.archive.org/web/20150108144329/https://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/