Open neonglb opened 2 years ago
It wouldn't really clash with the idea of draco and I agree it would be convenient. The main question would be if we could do this without changing the existing bitstream. We will think about it and see what can be done.
Hi,
with the current specification it's a little inconvenient to encode face attribute values by adding 3 corners with equal attribute values for each particular face. Therefore, do you consider to define an own section for face attributes, accessible via
FaceIndex
(similar to how the attribute value mapping works withPointIndex
)? Or does this somehow clash with the idea of draco?