search

google / emoji4unicode

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/emoji4unicode
Apache License 2.0
52 stars 20 forks source link

Annotation proposal for e-B45 and e-B4A #131

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
e-B45   CROSS MARK
I would like an annotation to suggest to harmonize the design with U+26E2 as 
they are used 
together.

e-B4A   WHITE HEAVY CHECK MARK
The reason is not unified with "U+2714 HEAVY CHECK MARK" was not apparent from 
the comment.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by k...@apple.com on 24 Jan 2009 at 1:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
e-B45   CROSS MARK
I would like an annotation to suggest to harmonize the design with U+26E2 as 
they are
used together.

Question: are you saying that the current design is not right? Or do you just 
want
there to be a note saying that U=26E2 is a pair?

e-B4A   WHITE HEAVY CHECK MARK
The reason is not unified with "U+2714 HEAVY CHECK MARK" was not apparent from 
the
comment.

A: In this case, both e-b49 and e-b4a are heavy check marks. Once we unify 
e-b49 with
U-2714, then what is left is U+2713, which is **not heavy** and should not be 
unified
with e-b4a. So using the principle outlined here:

http://sites.google.com/site/unicodesymbols/Home/emoji-symbols/chart-legend

"For cases where color is the only source distinction, the convention is to map 
to
BLACK and WHITE where there are two choices, and to BLACK, WHITE, and CHECKERED 
where
there are three, and to BLACK, WHITE, CHECKERED. and STRIPED where there are 
four."

We came up with BLACK-WHITE naming in this case. We can add a note to explain 
this
briefly.

Original comment by katmomoi on 24 Jan 2009 at 2:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
>Or do you just want there to be a note saying that U=26E2 is a pair?

Right.

Original comment by k...@apple.com on 24 Jan 2009 at 1:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
e-B4A   WHITE HEAVY CHECK MARK

Sorry I was looking at the wrong chart (design.html). The note is not necessary 
as it is clear from how it is represented in utc.html.

Original comment by k...@apple.com on 24 Jan 2009 at 2:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Looks like Kat and Kida-san are in agreement for additional annotations on 
e-B44 and 
e-B45.

Original comment by markus.icu on 25 Jan 2009 at 12:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Fixed in r134 by adding annotation notes to HEAVY LARGE CIRCLE and CROSS MARK.

Original comment by katmomoi on 27 Jan 2009 at 1:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
looks good

Original comment by markus.icu on 27 Jan 2009 at 6:48