google / emoji4unicode

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/emoji4unicode
Apache License 2.0
51 stars 20 forks source link

feedback from Douglas Davidson #68

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
(I am omitting feedback already provided by others.)

First, two questions about unification:

e-4E2 BILL WITH YEN SIGN:  is this clearly distinguished from an
enclosed yen sign?

[...]

e-02A CLOCK SYMBOL:  none of the other clock variants have "symbol" in
their names; perhaps just CLOCK would suffice

e-198 HAIR NEEDING A CUT:  the original significance seems to be
something like "hairdresser" or "beauty parlor"; perhaps this could be
shorted to just HAIRCUT

e-1AC RED FACED OGRE:  names probably shouldn't mention color unless
it's really necessary--perhaps this could be JAPANESE OGRE or ONI
DEMON or something similar

e-1B0 EXTRATERRESTRIAL ALIEN:  perhaps ALIEN HEAD or ALIEN FACE would
be more consistent

e-1B5 GUARDSMAN:  the first female Beefeater was appointed last year,
so perhaps something ungendered like GUARD or BEEFEATER might be better

e-1E1 HONEY BEE:  this is more usually one word, HONEYBEE

e-328 FACE WITH LOOK OF TRIUMPH:  this would be more consistent as
TRIUMPHANT FACE

e-329 FACE WINKING WITH STUCK OUT TONGUE:  this would be more
consistent as WINKING FACE WITH STUCK OUT TONGUE

e-32B FACE WITH YUMMY LOOK:  this sounds odd, but I'm not sure what
would be better; perhaps SATISFIED FACE

e-32E FACE WITH A MASK:  this would be more consistent as FACE WITH MASK

e-339 LITTLE CRYING FACE:  'little' seems inappropriate here, since
the face isn't little; perhaps just CRYING FACE would be enough to
distinguish it from e-33A

e-33B PALE FACE:  this would be more consistent as FEARFUL FACE

e-341 SHOCKED FACE WITH SCREAM:  perhaps just SHOCKED FACE or
SCREAMING FACE would suffice

e-343 SMIRKY FACE:  this would be more consistent as SMIRKING FACE

e-345 DISAPPOINTED BUT RELIEVED FACE:  this might be more consistent
as DISAPPOINTED FACE WITH COLD SWEAT

e-35A PERSON MAKING POUTING FACE  this might be more consistent as
PERSON WITH POUTING FACE

e-4B0 BLACK HOUSE, e-4B1 HOME:  usually 'black' is used to distinguish
filled-in from open glyphs, but that doesn't seem to be the
distinction here

e-514 TWO JAPANESE FLAGS:  perhaps CROSSED JAPANESE FLAGS instead

e-519 GIRLS DOLLS FESTIVAL:  the repeated 's' suffix seems awkward;
perhaps GIRLS DOLL FESTIVAL instead

e-51D JAPANESE SPARKLER:  is this specifically Japanese, or would just
SPARKLER suffice?

e-520 DECORATIVE CONFETTI BALL:  are there non-decorative confetti
balls?  perhaps just CONFETTI BALL would suffice

e-530 LOUD SPEAKER:  this is more usually one word, LOUDSPEAKER

e-B7F SYMBOLS SIGN:  generally 'sign' seems to be used for an actual
physical sign, 'symbol' for a written symbol; for consistency with the
surrounding characters, this would have to be SYMBOLS SYMBOL

e-553 FOOT PRINTS:  this is more usually one word, FOOTPRINTS

e-805 BLACK SILK HAT:  perhaps TOP HAT instead

e-80F A DIE:  few other names have an article; if DIE is ambiguous,
perhaps SIX-SIDED DIE would do

e-972 MEAT ON A BONE:  perhaps this could omit the article, and just
be MEAT ON BONE

e-974 ROASTED SWEET POTATO:  perhaps just SWEET POTATO would suffice

e-97C LOLLYPOP:  this is more usually LOLLIPOP

Original issue reported on code.google.com by markus.icu on 7 Jan 2009 at 10:44

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Douglas also suggested:

e-4D6 HIGH HEELED SHOE:  perhaps HIGH-HEELED SHOE might be better

I replied:

We are planning to rename this one WOMANS PUMPS: [link to issue 60]

And Rick replied to that:

Even worse. I like Doug Davidson's suggestion better than that.

Original comment by markus.icu on 7 Jan 2009 at 11:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Can we decide to go with HIGH-HEELED SHOE on this one? Unless I hear otherwise, 
it
will be HIGH-HEELED SHOE.

Original comment by katmomoi on 12 Jan 2009 at 9:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
HIGH-HEELED SHOE works for me.

Original comment by markus.icu on 12 Jan 2009 at 9:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
A change to HIGH-HEELED SHOE was made in r97. We will address the remaining
suggestions in this issue.

Original comment by katmomoi on 12 Jan 2009 at 10:44

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
My replies to the items except the 10 issues concerning faces. They will be 
dealt with separately. 

====
e-4E2 BILL WITH YEN SIGN:  is this clearly distinguished from an
enclosed yen sign?

--> Yes. e-4e2 is an oblong check with the Yen sign on it. It is not a simple 
enclosed Yen sign. 

[...]

e-02A CLOCK SYMBOL:  none of the other clock variants have "symbol" in
their names; perhaps just CLOCK would suffice

--> We could rename this to CLOCK FACE SYMBOL to be consistent with the rest of 
the series. I think 'SYMBOL'is needed to indicate the general nature of 
this Emoji.

e-198 HAIR NEEDING A CUT:  the original significance seems to be
something like "hairdresser" or "beauty parlor"; perhaps this could be
shorted to just HAIRCUT

--> HAIRCUT will be fine. Add a note about beauty parlor. We also need a design 
note that this Emoji needs to show a female.

e-1AC RED FACED OGRE:  names probably shouldn't mention color unless
it's really necessary--perhaps this could be JAPANESE OGRE or ONI
DEMON or something similar

--> The Japanese name refers to "Namahage", a local yea-end event/tradition in 
Akita. Namahage faces can be red or blue and they are not necessary ogres. 
I propose to change this to:

ONI-FACED DEMON (or lessd preferred OGRE-FACED DEMON).

e-1B0 EXTRATERRESTRIAL ALIEN:  perhaps ALIEN HEAD or ALIEN FACE would
be more consistent

--> The KDDI Emoji shows an alien ship while the Softbank version shows an 
alien face. Both are meant to represent an extraterrestrial. We should keep the 
current naming.

e-1B5 GUARDSMAN:  the first female Beefeater was appointed last year,
so perhaps something ungendered like GUARD or BEEFEATER might be better

--> We rejected BEEFEATER because it is too specific. GUARDSMAN is used for 
both male and female members of the military guard. I propose to keep this as 
is.

e-1E1 HONEY BEE:  this is more usually one word, HONEYBEE

--> Agreed. Change to HONEYBEE

e-4B0 BLACK HOUSE, e-4B1 HOME:  usually 'black' is used to distinguish
filled-in from open glyphs, but that doesn't seem to be the
distinction here

--> The docomo Emoji is filled but the other 2 Emoji are not. Need to discuss 
this.

e-514 TWO JAPANESE FLAGS:  perhaps CROSSED JAPANESE FLAGS instead

--> CROSSED JAPANESE FLAGS sounds OK to me and more descriptive. I suggest a 
change to this naming.

e-519 GIRLS DOLLS FESTIVAL:  the repeated 's' suffix seems awkward;
perhaps GIRLS DOLL FESTIVAL instead

--> I am OK with the suggested change. It sounds better.

e-51D JAPANESE SPARKLER:  is this specifically Japanese, or would just
SPARKLER suffice?

--> Keep the current name. 線香花火 is a sparkler made in the shape of a 
burning incense stick. This is a special type of fireworks that originated in 
Japan.

e-520 DECORATIVE CONFETTI BALL:  are there non-decorative confetti
balls?  perhaps just CONFETTI BALL would suffice

--> Normally no. I am OK with CONFETTI BALL

e-530 LOUD SPEAKER:  this is more usually one word, LOUDSPEAKER

--. Change to LOUDSPEAKER

e-B7F SYMBOLS SIGN:  generally 'sign' seems to be used for an actual
physical sign, 'symbol' for a written symbol; for consistency with the
surrounding characters, this would have to be SYMBOLS SYMBOL

--> Yes. Or else simply SYMBOLS

e-553 FOOT PRINTS:  this is more usually one word, FOOTPRINTS

--> Agreed. Chaneg to FOOTPRINTS

e-805 BLACK SILK HAT:  perhaps TOP HAT instead

--> The Japanese name is simply "Silk hat" and no mention of color. How about 
SILK HAT or TOP HAT? 

e-80F A DIE:  few other names have an article; if DIE is ambiguous,
perhaps SIX-SIDED DIE would do

--> To avoid an article, how about GAME DIE. SIX_SIDED DIE sounds good, too. 
But is there any other kind of dice?

e-972 MEAT ON A BONE:  perhaps this could omit the article, and just
be MEAT ON BONE

--> I am OK with changing this to MEAT ON BONE

e-974 ROASTED SWEET POTATO:  perhaps just SWEET POTATO would suffice

--> No change. Yakiimo (焼き芋) refers to **roasted** potato of a certain 
type.

e-97C LOLLYPOP:  this is more usually LOLLIPOP

--> Merriam Webster's 11th Collegiate English Dictionary has LOLLIPOP as the 
main entery and LOLLYPOP as a vriant. Will change to more common LOLLIPOP

Original comment by katmomoi on 15 Jan 2009 at 9:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
About e-80F A DIE: Yes, there are other dice with more faces, often used in 
adventure 
games. E.g., http://images.google.com/images?q=12+sided+die

Depending on how specific this wants to be, GAME DIE or SIX SIDED DIE could 
work. 
(Unicode character names seem to usually omit the hyphen, as in U+2736 SIX 
POINTED 
BLACK STAR.)

Original comment by markus.icu on 15 Jan 2009 at 10:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
e-530  LOUDSPEAKER - this looks like an outdoors public announcement 
loudspeaker so its not wrong, but it 
doesn't contrast well with MEGAPHONE.
http://images.google.com/images?gbv=2&hl=en&q=loudspeaker&btnG=Search+Images

e-52F  MEGAPHONE - this is an old-fashioned shouting cone, wheras modern 
hand-held megaphones are 
electric and look like LOUDSPEAKER with a pistol grip. 
http://images.google.com/images?gbv=2&hl=en&q=megaphone&btnG=Search+Images

PROPOSAL: Draw a modern indoors hi-fi loudspeaker for LOUDSPEAKER & use the 
existing LOUDSPEAKER 
glyph with a pistol grip for e-52F MEGAPHONE as the pistol grip is distinct to 
this usage.

Original comment by loft...@apple.com on 15 Jan 2009 at 11:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Apple/Google:

e-328 FACE WITH LOOK OF TRIUMPH:  this would be more consistent as
TRIUMPHANT FACE
-> no change

e-329 FACE WINKING WITH STUCK OUT TONGUE:  this would be more
consistent as WINKING FACE WITH STUCK OUT TONGUE
-> ok

e-32B FACE WITH YUMMY LOOK:  this sounds odd, but I'm not sure what
would be better; perhaps SATISFIED FACE
-> FACE SAVORING DELICIOUS FOOD

e-32E FACE WITH A MASK:  this would be more consistent as FACE WITH MASK
-> ok

e-339 LITTLE CRYING FACE:  'little' seems inappropriate here, since
the face isn't little; perhaps just CRYING FACE would be enough to
distinguish it from e-33A
-> ok

e-33B PALE FACE:  this would be more consistent as FEARFUL FACE
-> ok

e-341 SHOCKED FACE WITH SCREAM:  perhaps just SHOCKED FACE or
SCREAMING FACE would suffice
-> FACE SCREAMING IN FEAR

e-343 SMIRKY FACE:  this would be more consistent as SMIRKING FACE
-> ok

e-345 DISAPPOINTED BUT RELIEVED FACE:  this might be more consistent
as DISAPPOINTED FACE WITH COLD SWEAT
-> no change because of Japanese semantics

e-35A PERSON MAKING POUTING FACE  this might be more consistent as
PERSON WITH POUTING FACE
-> ok

Original comment by markus.icu on 16 Jan 2009 at 9:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Images of Monopoly House
http://images.google.com/images?gbv=2&hl=en&q=monopoly+house&btnG=Search+Images

Original comment by loft...@apple.com on 16 Jan 2009 at 10:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Apple/Google:

Go with Kat's reply, except for the following:

e-02A CLOCK SYMBOL:  none of the other clock variants have "symbol" in
their names; perhaps just CLOCK would suffice

--> We could rename this to CLOCK FACE SYMBOL to be consistent with the rest of 
the 
series. I think 'SYMBOL'is needed to indicate the general nature of 
this Emoji.

-> change to ALARM CLOCK and change the glyph

e-1AC RED FACED OGRE:  names probably shouldn't mention color unless
it's really necessary--perhaps this could be JAPANESE OGRE or ONI
DEMON or something similar

--> The Japanese name refers to "Namahage", a local yea-end event/tradition in 
Akita. 
Namahage faces can be red or blue and they are not necessary ogres. 
I propose to change this to:

ONI-FACED DEMON (or lessd preferred OGRE-FACED DEMON).

-> change to OGRE
-> Annotate: "In Japanese, Oni"

-> also change e-1AD LONG NOSED GOBLIN to GOBLIN
-> Annotate: "In Japanese, Tengu"

e-4B0 BLACK HOUSE, e-4B1 HOME:  usually 'black' is used to distinguish
filled-in from open glyphs, but that doesn't seem to be the
distinction here

--> The docomo Emoji is filled but the other 2 Emoji are not. Need to discuss 
this.

-> e-4B0: HOUSE BUILDING
-> e-4B1: HOUSE WITH YARD

e-51D JAPANESE SPARKLER:  is this specifically Japanese, or would just
SPARKLER suffice?

--> Keep the current name. 線香花火 is a sparkler made in the shape of a 
burning 
incense stick. This is a special type of fireworks that originated in 
Japan.

-> FIREWORK SPARKLER

e-530 LOUD SPEAKER:  this is more usually one word, LOUDSPEAKER

--. Change to LOUDSPEAKER

-> handled with issue 101

e-B7F SYMBOLS SIGN:  generally 'sign' seems to be used for an actual
physical sign, 'symbol' for a written symbol; for consistency with the
surrounding characters, this would have to be SYMBOLS SYMBOL

--> Yes. Or else simply SYMBOLS

-> SYMBOLS INPUT SYMBOL
-> also change e-B80 ENGLISH LANGUAGE SYMBOL to LATIN LETTERS SYMBOL

e-805 BLACK SILK HAT:  perhaps TOP HAT instead

--> The Japanese name is simply "Silk hat" and no mention of color. How about 
SILK 
HAT or TOP HAT? 

-> TOP HAT

e-80F A DIE:  few other names have an article; if DIE is ambiguous,
perhaps SIX-SIDED DIE would do

--> To avoid an article, how about GAME DIE. SIX_SIDED DIE sounds good, too. 
But is 
there any other kind of dice?

-> GAME DIE

Original comment by markus.icu on 16 Jan 2009 at 11:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by markus.icu on 20 Jan 2009 at 11:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Fixed in r131. Made agreed on changes in comment 5 and comment 10.
Also provided/modified description and design notes.

Original comment by katmomoi on 23 Jan 2009 at 12:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
r131 looks good, but it's missing the changes for face symbols from comment 8. 
Please 
make those changes as well.

Original comment by markus.icu on 23 Jan 2009 at 9:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Thanks for pointing out the omissions. 
r132 fixes all the issues mentioned in comment 8.

Original comment by katmomoi on 23 Jan 2009 at 10:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
thanks!

Original comment by markus.icu on 23 Jan 2009 at 10:47