Closed davelab6 closed 3 years ago
yes, FontBakery detects this problem nowadays:
But this family was added back at 4d442fa119714832efd1ad3e019f0b18615e9508 last July 29 when we still did not have these checks on Font Bakery.
We also have a few more problems in this font detected by a recently implemented FB check:
I'm tackling this, but I want to point out that you're looking at the wrong PR, which got "blocked". The current one is here: #2661
I close this since it is resolved
This 0 value should not have been accepted, and has been set to the axis minimum here, 6
https://github.com/google/fonts/commit/92ec7cb6699bcdc28a8c23a38805820a2161cd66
Originally posted by me at https://github.com/google/fonts/pull/2577#r512413769
@yanone is that the correct value?