Currently most DRC check manipulate two types of layer:
local layers, prefixed with the rule name and .forgeted at the end of the rule
global layers, with no particulat naming convention and .forgeted at the end of the deck
I wonder if it would make sense to adopt a naming convention to differentiate between the two or even better implement each rule in a separate function w/ a block so that it can be explicit the scoping ex:
Currently most DRC check manipulate two types of layer:
.forget
ed at the end of the rule.forget
ed at the end of the deckI wonder if it would make sense to adopt a naming convention to differentiate between the two or even better implement each rule in a separate function w/ a block so that it can be explicit the scoping ex: