Closed perotinus closed 8 years ago
Should I just nuke the 1.1 release and recreate it after this lands?
Also, should we tag the version like protobuf diff: https://github.com/google/protobuf/blob/master/Protobuf.podspec#L15
Nuking 1.1 SGTM, assuming no-one is depending on it. I'll update the podspec.
I like the protobuf version tagging scheme, and like consistency across our projects. Do we want to do the same thing for GTM?
Naming - sure.
OK, done there too. That will mean that, starting with 2.0.0, the scheme will change from google-toolbox-for-mac-x.y.z to vx.y.z, which seems reasonable to me.
Were you gonna send in the SessionFetcher spec so this one works?
Please squash these two commits into a single one so we get one thing landing to add the podspec.
Divam is working on a GTMSessionFetcher podspec. He has it working, but he's been tied up with other work and wants to convert it to Ruby before making a PR.
I'll squash the commits, though, so this is ready when that one is.
This depends on a not-yet-created podspec for GTMSessionFetcher, which will block using this (and testing it).
Also note that the tagging in the repository prevents this podspec from automatically mapping to a tagged version. This could be changed in the future.
Continuation and slight rework of #41.