Slightly improve DecodeCopy() performance.

[mverver-google]

Instead of increasing address every iteration of the loop, we can just keep it fixed and double the number of bytes copied every iteration. This works because the string to be generated is periodic.

For example, if we want to copy 9 bytes starting 2 bytes back:

   |-------| size 9
abc.........
 ^ ^
 | |
 | target_bytes_decoded: 3
 address: 1

Then the old version of the code would generate these intermediate states:

abc.........
 ^ ^
abcbc....... (1)
   ^ ^
abcbcbc..... (2)
     ^ ^
abcbcbcbc... (3)
       ^ ^
abcbcbcbcbc. (4)
         ^ ^
abcbcbcbcbcb (5, outside the loop)

While the new version would double the range to be copied every time:

abc.........
 ^ ^
abcbc....... (1)
 ^   ^
abcbcbcbc... (2)
 ^       ^
abcbcbcbcbcb (3, outside the loop)

In general, if s = size and d = (target_bytes_decoded - address), then the number of calls to CopyBytes is reduced from (s/d) + 1 to log(s/d)/log(2) + 1.

The total time complexity is still O(s) because CopyBytes is presumably linear in the number of bytes copied, but we end up doing fewer calls in total, which is likely to be faster in practice, especially if s is large and d is small.