Closed jsegitz closed 3 years ago
Yes something may have gone wrong with the bisection here. Would you be able to correct the commit via a PR for https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/selinux/OSV-2021-585.yaml?
On a somewhat unrelated note, looking at a bunch of CVEs pointing to OSS-Fuzz with descriptions with flattened backtraces copy-pasted from bug reports on Monorail and assigned at apparently the same time I wonder if the OSS-Fuzz project (or the OSV project) has started assigning CVEs automatically left and right?
On a somewhat unrelated note, looking at a bunch of CVEs pointing to OSS-Fuzz with descriptions with flattened backtraces copy-pasted from bug reports on Monorail and assigned at apparently the same time I wonder if the OSS-Fuzz project (or the OSV project) has started assigning CVEs automatically left and right?
Nope, not us :) someone else must be watching our oss-fuzz-vulns repo and doing this.
On a somewhat unrelated note, looking at a bunch of CVEs pointing to OSS-Fuzz with descriptions with flattened backtraces copy-pasted from bug reports on Monorail and assigned at apparently the same time I wonder if the OSS-Fuzz project (or the OSV project) has started assigning CVEs automatically left and right?
@evverx - can you please give us some examples. i am curious on who is helping the oss ecosystem with tracking cves.
@inferno-chromium I think one example of that script (or whatever that was) in action would be all the CVEs assigned to the selinux project on July 1st: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-36084 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-36085 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-36086 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-36087
I'm curious about who that was as well (mostly because I think that blindly assigning CVEs to all the issues OSS-Fuzz considers "vulnerabilities" isn't helpful)
A couple more here can be found here: https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelist/search?q=oss-fuzz-vulns (23 at time of writing).
Yes something may have gone wrong with the bisection here. Would you be able to correct the commit via a PR for https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/selinux/OSV-2021-585.yaml?
yes, I plan to work on this later this week and will submit there once I figured it out
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/pull/5 changes this to the correct commit
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/selinux/OSV-2021-585.yaml lists https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/commit/bad0a746e9f4cf260dedba5828d9645d50176aac as fix, but that doesn't seem reasonable. I suspect that the fix for CVE-2021-36085/CVE-2021-36086 fixed this issue too and the bot went wrong somewhere