Allow control over allowed individual package upgrade versions in non-interactive guided remediation

[michaelkedar]

Currently, osv-scanner fix has two flags:

• --disallow-major-upgrades (bool), which prevents major updates in all packages
• --disallow-package-upgrades (list of string), which prevents all updates to the listed packages.

We should replace these flags with per-package allowed update levels e.g. --allowed-upgrades=foo=none,bar=major,baz=minor.

Syntax might be a bit tricky and needs some thought:

• Should this be allowed-upgrades or disallowed-upgrades?
• Is pkg1=type1,pkg2=type2 okay syntax for all ecosystems? (i.e. does any ecosystem allow for '=' in a package name?)
• How to apply rules to all packages (e.g. all=major could refer to the package named all)
• What can be allowed.? e.g. major/minor/patch/none
  • Consider what this would mean for non-semver ecosystems
  • Maybe allow for some regex rules to deal with e.g. com.google.guava:guava having versions that end with -jre and -android

[oliverchang]

How about something like --upgrade-config ? and rather than having this be comma-separated, something like:

# Don't upgrade `PKG`
--upgrade-config=PKG:none

# Allow major upgrades
--upgrade-config=PKG:major

# Allow major upgrades, along with minor, patch and less significant upgrades
--upgrade-config=PKG:major

# Allow minor upgrades, along with patch and less significant
--upgrade-config=PKG:minor

# Allow patch only upgrades (and less significant)
--upgrade-config=PKG:patch

# Allow major upgrades to all packages (default)
--upgrade-config=major

# Allow minor (and less significant) only upgrades to all packages
--upgrade-config=minor

Now what happens if an ecosystem allows ":" in package names? This seems OK because we can just split on the last ":". If someone has a package name called "foo:patch", and it's incorrect to pass that directly as --upgrade-config=foo:patch.

And we can specify this flag multiple times for different packages:

--upgrade-config=PKG1:none --upgrade-config:PKG2:minor

[michaelkedar]

and rather than having this be comma-separated, something like

urfave/cli's StringSliceFlag seems to by default accept both comma-separated strings and repeating the flag multiple times. e.g. --flag a,b --flag=c,d gives ["a", "b", "c", "d"], so we could support either way (unless commas are valid in some ecosystem's package names :thinking:).

I'm happy with this suggestion, with --upgrade-config being what is allowed.

Just to clarify how we'd treat the unspecified packages:

# allow all upgrades for all packages (default behaviour if unspecified)
--upgrade-config=major

# allow up to minor version upgrades for PKG, and any upgrades for all other packages
--upgrade-config=PKG:minor

# allow up to minor version upgrades for PKG, and no upgrades to any other packages
--upgrade-config=none --upgrade-config=PKG:minor

And mapping the existing flags to the new one:

--disallow-major-upgrades => --upgrade-config=minor
--disallow-package-upgrades=PKG1,PKG2 => --upgrade-config=PKG1:none,PKG2:none