we have the issue, that we want to replace a field in our protobuf types depending on the context (the DateFetchingEnvironment). The use case for this is that our type contains a map of languages to labels.
We want to resolve the label as a string depending on the Accept-Language Header sent by the client and thus need the context of the request for the type modification.
As far as I understand it, if we use Type.find(...).replaceField(...) we need to implement type coercing which does not have access to the context.
Our approach was to implement two SchemaModifications:
However, it seems we cannot guarantee the order in which the modifications are executed.
Is there a solution to this problem that we overlook?
Otherwise, would it be possible to add a parameter to the SchemaModifcation Annotation that ensures the order in which they are applied?
Hello,
we have the issue, that we want to replace a field in our protobuf types depending on the context (the DateFetchingEnvironment). The use case for this is that our type contains a map of languages to labels. We want to resolve the label as a string depending on the Accept-Language Header sent by the client and thus need the context of the request for the type modification. As far as I understand it, if we use
Type.find(...).replaceField(...)
we need to implement type coercing which does not have access to the context. Our approach was to implement two SchemaModifications:However, it seems we cannot guarantee the order in which the modifications are executed.
Is there a solution to this problem that we overlook? Otherwise, would it be possible to add a parameter to the SchemaModifcation Annotation that ensures the order in which they are applied?