smcallis
commented
7 months ago I found a bit of prior art that uses the Chromium project instead: https://style.mla.org/citing-source-code/, so I think something like that would be fine with "S2 Authors" instead. Otherwise no strong opinions from me :)
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 9:15 AM Christopher Krapu @.***> wrote:
What would be the best way to cite this work? Currently, I was planning to do this:
S2 Developers. “S2 Geometry Library,” http://s2geometry.io/. Accessed January 14, 2024.
Is there a more appropriate article or set of authors to list?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/google/s2geometry/issues/340, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGEMKWX5JTELHAN27S7PF3YOVIZXAVCNFSM6AAAAABB3QR3BOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGA4DEMZTGUZDMNY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
What would be the best way to cite this work? Currently, I was planning to do this:
S2 Developers. “S2 Geometry Library,” http://s2geometry.io/. Accessed January 14, 2024.
Is there a more appropriate article or set of authors to list?