Closed alexliu0809 closed 4 years ago
Hi guys,
Thanks for this amazing tool.
As previously mentioned in this issue, many folks are seeing discrepancies between the client and safe browsing-enabled browsers.
I specifically observed that a huge of amount of cdns/apis of Chinese services are marked as unsafe by the api client. Examples include "hlsa-akm.douyucdn.cn", "gslb.miaopai.com/", and "switch.pcfg.cache.wpscdn.cn". These sites are marked as unsafe by the API. However, the transparency report says it is SAFE.
A sample query result from the API.
{ "matches": [ { "threatType": "UNWANTED_SOFTWARE", "platformType": "ANDROID", "threat": { "url": "gslb.miaopai.com/" }, "cacheDuration": "300s", "threatEntryType": "URL" }, { "threatType": "UNWANTED_SOFTWARE", "platformType": "ANDROID", "threat": { "url": "switch.pcfg.cache.wpscdn.cn" }, "cacheDuration": "300s", "threatEntryType": "URL" } ] }
Any ideas on what's up? I am also curious why these sites are considered "UNWANTED_SOFTWARE" in "ANDROID" only. Thanks
For future reference, there's a bug in Safe Browsing's diagnose tool, and they are working on fixing it
Hi guys,
Thanks for this amazing tool.
As previously mentioned in this issue, many folks are seeing discrepancies between the client and safe browsing-enabled browsers.
I specifically observed that a huge of amount of cdns/apis of Chinese services are marked as unsafe by the api client. Examples include "hlsa-akm.douyucdn.cn", "gslb.miaopai.com/", and "switch.pcfg.cache.wpscdn.cn". These sites are marked as unsafe by the API. However, the transparency report says it is SAFE.
A sample query result from the API.
Any ideas on what's up? I am also curious why these sites are considered "UNWANTED_SOFTWARE" in "ANDROID" only. Thanks