Open clconway opened 5 years ago
I'd like to be able to invoke a subcommand using a unique prefix instead of having to type an exact match. E.g., if "foo" defines subcommands "dobaz", "doqux" and "dropit", then
"foo dob", "foo doba" -> "foo dobaz" "foo doq", "foo doqu" -> "foo doqux" "foo dr", "foo dro", ... -> "foo dropit" "foo d", "foo do" -> error, ambiguous prefix
This is sufficiently different behavior from previously that it should probably be optional, but I'm not sure how best to fit it in.
I have an implementation I use in my own code that I can contribute.
I'd like to be able to invoke a subcommand using a unique prefix instead of having to type an exact match. E.g., if "foo" defines subcommands "dobaz", "doqux" and "dropit", then
This is sufficiently different behavior from previously that it should probably be optional, but I'm not sure how best to fit it in.
I have an implementation I use in my own code that I can contribute.