should merged file pass feedvalidator? & merge fails 1.2.6: Error 6 (net::ERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND): The file or directory could not be found.

[bdferris]

From marcymic...@gmail.com on October 03, 2010 11:50:46

What steps will reproduce the problem? 1.both separate files validate (w/warnings of near expiration & future date, as expected)  There are no warnings of distance too far from the shape, each file has expected handful of too fast travel 2.both files have many shared stops (as expected) 3.merge runs but does not outputfile What is the expected output? What do you see instead? merged__.zip Error 6 (net::ERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND): The file or directory could not be found. I also see 460+ too far from the shape, e.g.: For trip SE_sf_T04 the stop "Hancock Street at Sims Way" (ID 1476) is 3618 meters away from the corresponding point (shape_dist_traveled: 7.048000) on shape SE. It should be closer than 1000 meters. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? merge.exe version 1.2.6 on Windows 7 (this is new for me, is this the culprit?) running in DOS (Windows\system32\cmd) Please provide any additional information below. attempting to create current & future feed where future has new or modified routes after Oct 17, which we hope to post this week to ease proper planning of future travel & rollout of new service & avoid gap in service

when I run validator in the merged file - perhaps W7 has introduced a new gremlin (grrrr)

Merge has worked in XP but first attempt in Windows 7 it has Error 6; when I lugged the files & ran in Windows XP virtual mode (or whatever that is called) I can get merge to output merged file, however there are 00s of error on shapes distance (see file named: mergddjta.zip)

Should the merged.zip file pass the validator & display in ScheduleViewer ??

perhaps I need to create unique shapes names?? I will do, & hopefully report it solves part of this challenge & documentation will be needed for others (I suggest)

Your guidance appreciated

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/googletransitdatafeed/issues/detail?id=257

[bdferris]

From marcymic...@gmail.com on October 03, 2010 12:00:17

renaming one of the shapes made the 00s of shape_dist errors go POOF

[bdferris]

From view...@gmail.com on October 03, 2010 12:45:03

if related, the merged feed at PCFE sits in process for 30+ min. unless I fetch again http://www.google.com/base/partnercontent/feedhistory?cid=5809183&fid=1547943

[bdferris]

From view...@gmail.com on December 11, 2011 15:13:48

using FV 1.2.10 merge resolves to Error 6 (as before when posted in rev 1.2.6) This is what I see and while I see merge execute I do not get a resulting merged file

No webpage was found for the web address: file:///C:/directory_details/merge-results.html Error 6 (net::ERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND): The file or directory could not be found.

How can I know which file is missing & why merge is problematic

Are there updates to merge that might be posted in the wiki https://code.google.com/p/googletransitdatafeed/wiki/Merge Is there a web-based merge that could be stable?

I was hoping to get Dec+Jan feeds to merge with ease.

[bdferris]

From bdfer...@google.com on September 26, 2014 09:44:19

(No comment was entered for this change.)

Labels: Language-Python App-Merge