Closed juanlang closed 8 years ago
Forgot to address the u2f-tests piece, which should also be its sub-component IMO.
The no-ext branch has been removed. u2f-api.js has been merged between the two branches, and the differences between the running instances are now contained in a config file.
The intended difference between the no-ext branch and the master branch is which extension id is talked to. This should be addressed by different config files for the running server instance, but otherwise contain identical running code.
At the moment, the branches differ by more than just this respect:
In my opinion, the U2F extension source should be independent from the source for any particular web server instance.
Similarly, I believe the U2F high-level API library should be its own module, and a running web server instance would depend on it. In this way, a web server could integrate with a "stable" version talking only to Chrome if it wished, or include features still under active development.
I propose the u2f-ref-code repository be structured instead into sub-modules, consisting of the followign sub-modules: chrome-extension source for U2F Chrome extension demo-server source for a demo web server demo-server-config source for a running web server's config files u2f-api source for U2F Javascript API library
The demo-server-config repository could have different configs on different branches.
The difference between the running instances https://u2fdemo.appspot.com and https://crxjs-dot-u2fdemo.appspot.com would then be:
Feedback or alternate proposals?