Closed dbarnett closed 9 years ago
Mostly looks reasonable, but see above.
LGTM whichever way you decide to go on the above, btw.
BTW, I'm still updating and addressing the other comments.
I think I do want to get the implicit order into the "natural order" that makes intuitive sense to me, but I'm still having trouble describing the algorithm in plain English. Anyway, I'm adding some tests for the ordering behavior since it's clearly non-trivial. =)
PTAL. Improved the default ordering and added more tests for it.
LGTM, thanks (and sorry for the delay).
Fix having to explicitly declare every built-in section when you use
@order
and complain if you have redundant definitions for the same section.Fixes #88.
Also adds a few initial tests to get the ball rolling on #29.