This would likely significantly boost the LCP improvement from prefetching. It would provide parity with AMP Packager's preloadimage, though needn't use the same set of heuristics.
I'm not familiar enough with the architecture of webpackager. Does this make more sense as a new Processor, a new HTMLTask, or something else?
This would likely significantly boost the LCP improvement from prefetching. It would provide parity with AMP Packager's preloadimage, though needn't use the same set of heuristics.
I'm not familiar enough with the architecture of webpackager. Does this make more sense as a new Processor, a new HTMLTask, or something else?