Interpolation problems in `Geologica[CRSV,SHRP,slnt,wght].ttf`

Hello!

This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in Geologica[CRSV,SHRP,slnt,wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.

The particular version of the font that was tested was archive:.

To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.

The report follows:

Glyph lira was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'slnt=-12.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [0, 2, 1] in 'slnt=-12.0'
Glyph notequal was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'SHRP=100.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [0, 2, 1] in 'SHRP=100.0'
  Masters: 'SHRP=100.0', 'SHRP=100.0 slnt=-12.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in 'SHRP=100.0', [0, 2, 1] in 'SHRP=100.0 slnt=-12.0'
  Masters: 'SHRP=100.0', 'SHRP=100.0 wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in 'SHRP=100.0', [0, 2, 1] in 'SHRP=100.0 wght=900.0'
Glyph uni01EA was not compatible:
  Masters: 'SHRP=100.0', 'SHRP=100.0 slnt=-12.0':
    Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in 'SHRP=100.0', 15 in 'SHRP=100.0 slnt=-12.0'; reversed: False
  Masters: 'SHRP=100.0', 'SHRP=100.0 wght=900.0':
    Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in 'SHRP=100.0', 15 in 'SHRP=100.0 wght=900.0'; reversed: False
Glyph uni0324 was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'slnt=-12.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1] in '', [1, 0] in 'slnt=-12.0'

This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please apologize and ignore & close it.

To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.

googlefonts / geologica

Interpolation problems in `Geologica[CRSV,SHRP,slnt,wght].ttf` #15