Closed davelab6 closed 1 year ago
Doh, after double checking, ƹ
is actually U+01B9) which is already in the African set, not U+01BC which is another character and a typo by the person who reached out. So, nothing to do here :)
@davelab6 What is your definition of GF Latin African? Lebanese Arabic isn’t African. Considering #123 which would remove a lot of glyphs not used in African languages, should the set be redefined and renamed?
(Similar to #119 opened by @EbenSorkin)
A user wrote in to fonts@google.com with the following
Ƹ
is in GF Latin African (https://github.com/search?type=code&q=repo%3Agooglefonts%2Fglyphsets+01B8)ƹ
is not yet in any set (https://github.com/search?type=code&q=repo%3Agooglefonts%2Fglyphsets+01BC)Ə
is in GF Latin Beyond (https://github.com/search?type=code&q=repo%3Agooglefonts%2Fglyphsets+0259)ɂ
is in GF Latin Beyond (https://github.com/search?type=code&q=repo%3Agooglefonts%2Fglyphsets+025B)So, I propose to add
ƹ
to the GF Latin African set.