This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in Literata[opsz,wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
The particular version of the font that was tested was archive:.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph brevecombcy.case was not compatible:
Masters: 'opsz=72.0', 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0':
Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in 'opsz=72.0', 46 in 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0'; reversed: False
Masters: 'opsz=72.0', 'opsz=72.0 wght=900.0':
Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in 'opsz=72.0', 46 in 'opsz=72.0 wght=900.0'; reversed: False
Glyph minus was not compatible:
Masters: 'opsz=72.0', 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0':
Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in 'opsz=72.0', 1 in 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0'; reversed: True
Glyph percent was not compatible:
Masters: 'opsz=72.0', 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0':
Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in 'opsz=72.0', 3 in 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0'; reversed: True
Glyph perthousand was not compatible:
Masters: 'opsz=72.0', 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0':
Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in 'opsz=72.0', 3 in 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0'; reversed: True
Glyph plus was not compatible:
Masters: 'opsz=72.0', 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0':
Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in 'opsz=72.0', 11 in 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0'; reversed: True
Glyph plusminus was not compatible:
Masters: 'opsz=72.0', 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0':
Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in 'opsz=72.0', 11 in 'opsz=72.0 wght=200.0'; reversed: True
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please apologize and ignore & close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in
Literata[opsz,wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.The particular version of the font that was tested was archive:.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
This report was generated using the
fonttools varLib.interpolatabletool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please apologize and ignore & close it.To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.