Closed anthrotype closed 2 years ago
I do wonder if the 0 width check shouldn't still exist somewhere for bitmaps only. Still seems like a good change. Can we add something like a very narrow subset of the arabic mark example to expose these issues in a test?
i'll disentangle the issue about multiple CPAL palettes (this PR) from the one about zero-width glyphs, for which I am filing a separate PR https://github.com/googlefonts/nanoemoji/pull/424
I rebased this on top of #424, so the latter should be merged first. This PR basically adds the last commit 6e8e43c
@rsheeter I also took the liberty to fix #405 with https://github.com/googlefonts/nanoemoji/pull/423/commits/3807fc336c33d6f3e9c561d2362dc4763f9d8c69 since I was touching those lines anyway and was a small fix
Nice. Once this is merged/released you should maximum_color reem kufi ink on google/fonts :)
Once this is merged/released...
https://github.com/googlefonts/nanoemoji/releases/tag/v0.14.0
...you should maximum_color reem kufi ink on google/fonts :)
FYI I'm travelling tomorrow so I won't be able to do that until next week (in cause you want to give that a try)
in an attempt to fix https://github.com/googlefonts/nanoemoji/issues/421 and allow ReekKufiInk be converted from COLRv1 to OT-SVG...