Closed davelab6 closed 4 years ago
@paleydreier please schedule this :)
cc @sannorozco @pichotta
Well, fvar are you wish, but... Having the wght min at 250’s not such a bad thing because it’s not that light.
On Oct 15, 2018, at 8:24 PM, Dave Crossland notifications@github.com wrote:
Currently the Weight axis values in fvar do not go down to 100, as expected for CSS, but have carried over the legacy OS/2 table values which went down to 250 as a workaround for Windows auto-bolding of values of 249 and below.
Today:
Now both VFs have corrected fvar tables:
—Roboto-VF.ttf —Roboto-min-VF.ttf
I see in https://github.com/TypeNetwork/Roboto/commit/47598f229c77f87ecfc2e3767a6e2402e92f7c71 you did update only the Roboto-min-VF.ttf
Please check in Roboto-VF.ttf and the sources :)
Yes, only Roboto-min-VF.ttf needed to update far with these values, I checked again and far on both VFs seems good. Made a small update in min.designspace.
@sannorozco @dberlow can this issue be closed?
Currently the Weight axis values in
fvar
do not go down to 100, as expected for CSS, but have carried over the legacy OS/2 table values which went down to 250 as a workaround for Windows auto-bolding of values of 249 and below.Today:
What I expect: