What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Traverse a repository with lots of excluded content (e.g., many items in the
system or
workflow volumes).
or:
1. Traverse a repository with a traversal user that has very limited access to
the contents.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The Livelink connector tries to skip over excluded or inaccessible content
quickly, but if there are
thousands of such items in a row, by ModifyDate order, it is possible for the
connector to enter
an infinite loop. The traversal batch will continue past the timeout until it
finds content, and the
connector manager will then drop the found content on the floor and resume the
traversal from
the previous checkpoint.
Please use labels and text to provide additional information.
You can detect the infinite loop by looking for log entries containing "RESUME
TRAVERSAL",
"SKIPPING PAST", or "RESULTSET". Check for a RESUME TRAVERSAL entry followed by
a number of
SKIPPING PAST entries, then a single RESULTSET entry, then another RESUME
TRAVERSAL entry
with the same checkpoint string as the previous RESUME TRAVERSAL entry. Here's
a simplified
example:
FINE: RESUME TRAVERSAL: 100 rows from 2001-07-27 11:03:10,879496,2008-09-10 15:2
7:54,31773462.
FINER: SKIPPING PAST 2001-07-28 10:14:38,552306,2008-09-10 15:27:54,31773462
FINER: SKIPPING PAST 2001-07-28 20:01:15,564315,2008-09-10 15:27:54,31773462
FINER: SKIPPING PAST 2001-07-29 08:04:15,580327,2008-09-10 15:27:54,31773462
FINER: SKIPPING PAST 2001-07-30 08:31:02,588599,2008-09-10 15:27:54,31773462
FINE: RESULTSET: 71 rows. DELETESET: 0 rows.
FINE: RESUME TRAVERSAL: 100 rows from 2001-07-27 11:03:10,879496,2008-09-10 15:2
7:54,31773462.
A real example would typically have many more SKIPPING PAST log entries. Two
specific
examples from customers had 37 and 54 SKIPPING PAST entries between the
identical RESUME
TRAVERSAL entries.
If you encounter this problem, please contact Google Enterprise Support.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by jl1615@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2008 at 11:18
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jl1615@gmail.com
on 17 Oct 2008 at 11:18