googlegsa / sharepoint.v3

Google Search Appliance Connector for SharePoint
5 stars 10 forks source link

SharePoint 2007 List Item Attachments not crawled #182

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. I'm not the GSA Administrator so not sure of the setup
2. I only know that we are on SharePoint 2007 and our list item attachments are 
not discoverable within our intranet Google Search.
3. Is this a general problem with SharePoint 2007 or should this work?

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
List items (PDFs, Word documents) are returned when entering text in the search 
box that are contained within the list item attachments.  See no results 
instead.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Not sure.

Please provide any additional information below.
SharePoint Site Collection Admin settings are wide open for search availability 
and read permissions for anonymous access.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by vtki...@gmail.com on 4 Jan 2012 at 8:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Ok, found out the GSA isn't allowed to use JavaScript.  Would that be the 
problem?

Original comment by vtki...@gmail.com on 5 Jan 2012 at 1:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Connector should be able to crawl attachments for the list items. Could you 
please answer following questions?

1. What GSA version are you using?
2. Are you using on-board (internal) SharePoint connector? Or you installed an 
external one?
3. Have you configured metadata and URL feed or content feed?
4. If you have configured the connector in content feed mode, you can track the 
crawled URLs from crawl diagnostics and check what has been crawled under 
particular list.
5. Check the Include patterns in both connector and on GSA if they allow the 
specific pattern for the attachment URLs.

Original comment by deshpa...@google.com on 6 Jan 2012 at 10:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Closed as unreproducible without more details.

Original comment by jla...@google.com on 1 May 2012 at 8:55