The previous marker clusterer had an option to ignoreHidden, which I presume was a check for whether the marker was visible. With the new AdvancedMarkerElements, the only way to hide them is to set the map value to null, which hides them from the map.
Would it be possible for the markerClusterer to have an option that would check if the map value is null and thus not cluster those that are essentially hidden? at the moment all markers are clustered, regardless of whether they are visible or not.
If you would like to upvote the priority of this issue, please comment below or react on the original post above with :+1: so we can see what is popular when we triage.
@johnkamau Thank you for opening this issue. 🙏
Please check out these other resources that might help you get to a resolution in the meantime:
The previous marker clusterer had an option to ignoreHidden, which I presume was a check for whether the marker was visible. With the new AdvancedMarkerElements, the only way to hide them is to set the map value to null, which hides them from the map.
Would it be possible for the markerClusterer to have an option that would check if the map value is null and thus not cluster those that are essentially hidden? at the moment all markers are clustered, regardless of whether they are visible or not.