What's your feature request? Please describe.
For applications in the retail industry it is important that the checksum matches for barcodes with a format that has a checksum as a last digit.
Example from our world is an ITF barcode of length 22 for discounted article (perishable goods).
We notice that the checksum is not always valid with the scanner option configuration formats (all formats use Modulo10)
Currently we have to do some validity check additionally in the code which is quite slow.
Request: Modulo10 information as an additional scanner option or checksum flag if checksums are not already calculated.
Mobile environment
Android : com.google.mlkit:barcode-scanning version 17.2.0
Additional context
When modifying the code for the format ITF in the gsm scanner sample it will still always give the result of code128 which has another modulo and the result is also varying greatly.
Here is a sample of such a barcode in ITF standard with a checksum:
We wonder if today OCR scanner would outrun then the barcode scanner results for this particular format because a barcode of greater length is more prone to errors frail in the printing process.
Unfortunately nothing is stated in the documentation which lengths are supported for ITF formats or if checksums are validated already.
What's your feature request? Please describe. For applications in the retail industry it is important that the checksum matches for barcodes with a format that has a checksum as a last digit.
Example from our world is an ITF barcode of length 22 for discounted article (perishable goods).
We notice that the checksum is not always valid with the scanner option configuration formats (all formats use Modulo10)
Barcode.FORMAT_EAN_13, Barcode.FORMAT_EAN_8, Barcode.FORMAT_ITF, // interleaved2of5 Barcode.FORMAT_UPC_A
Currently we have to do some validity check additionally in the code which is quite slow.
Request: Modulo10 information as an additional scanner option or checksum flag if checksums are not already calculated.
Mobile environment Android : com.google.mlkit:barcode-scanning version 17.2.0
Additional context When modifying the code for the format ITF in the gsm scanner sample it will still always give the result of code128 which has another modulo and the result is also varying greatly.
Here is a sample of such a barcode in ITF standard with a checksum:
We wonder if today OCR scanner would outrun then the barcode scanner results for this particular format because a barcode of greater length is more prone to errors frail in the printing process.
Unfortunately nothing is stated in the documentation which lengths are supported for ITF formats or if checksums are validated already.