Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Well, it's perhaps more complicated than is evident.
The issue that seems to be confusing people is that we downsample (decimate) to
exactly screen resolution, and as a result, by default we get the usual filters
required to anti-alias at that resolution. This is, as I understand it, the
"correct" thing to do.
I have changed the latest version to do 4x screen resolution, to see if that's
more in line with what everyone expects. This will plot 4 points for every
screen pixel, and will filter accordingly. Note that it also means the render
loop takes 4x as long, and the server sends 4x as much data...
Original comment by zack.i...@gmail.com
on 1 Sep 2013 at 10:04
Further modifications:
* Filters have been set to now ignore the screen resolution
* There are more filter options
I believe the behavior should now match what most people expect.
Original comment by zack.i...@gmail.com
on 8 Oct 2013 at 11:58
Original comment by john.fro...@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2013 at 7:43
[deleted comment]
Users of XLTek Neuroworks 7.1 are happier now with the new decimation and
screen antialiasing filters. They had report the same complaints I submitted
here & their soln. is along the lines of Zack's newest 4x sampling, except that
in the "crushed" pixels (where there are more waveform points than available
pixels) they display *the maximum* of the bunch. This leads to the satisfactory
"true" waveform illusion.
Zack's fix also looked good enough on screen with 60Hz noise...
Original comment by echa...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2013 at 1:47
Issue 413 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by zack.i...@gmail.com
on 11 Oct 2013 at 5:02
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
echa...@gmail.com
on 19 Aug 2013 at 2:44