Closed davidhedlund closed 8 years ago
Wouldn't that require platform specific changes?
This would be a good time for someone to make a "SpyBlock Origin" fork or something like that, with the desired platform-specific functionality; I'm thinking that whatever was done to allow an Adblock Plus fork to activate a certain filter-list in private mode would be portable across Firefox extensions.
I do not intend to create/maintain yet another extension.
@gorhill This is not about create/maintain another extension but to add a private mode detection to uBO. If the author or IceCat would do that, would you adopt it then?
would you adopt it then?
Most likely not, because I can't make sense of such feature. I fail to see the point of a "non private mode" for uBO, which is what supporting a special "private mode" implies.
@gorhill Thank you. I told the icecat bugzilla mailing list about this so the IceCat maintainer can decide if he think its worth to do it himself.
I suggest that SpyBlock (part of GNU IceCat) fork its code from uBlock [Origin] rather than Adblock Plus.
IceCat author (Rubén Rodríguez) responded: "I made the Spyblock hack before uBlock was available (or well known anyway). It could be replaced, provided that we can implement with uBlock the same features SpyBlock provides over Adblock: extra lists that get enabled when entering private mode.
Since Spyblock is providing the desired functionality right now, replacing it for the sake of performance is not a priority compared with improving LibreJS, which is what I'll be working on next. But if somebody wants to contribute that code I'll be happy to add it."